"The condition that an operational leader present an ‘imminent’ threat of violent attack against the United States does not require the United States to have clear evidence that a specific attack on U.S. persons and interests will take place in the immediate future"
From the US memo that provides the justification for drone strikes on Americans.
“This is a chilling document,” said Jameel Jaffer, deputy legal director of the ACLU, which has sued unsuccessfully in court to obtain administration memos about the targeted killing of Americans. “Basically, it argues that the government has the right to carry out the extrajudicial killing of an American citizen. … It recognizes some limits on the authority it sets out, but the limits are elastic and vaguely defined, and it’s easy to see how they could be manipulated.”
In particular, Jaffer said, the memo “redefines the word imminence in a way that deprives the word of its ordinary meaning.”
This is an amazing report. The US has long resisted justifying how it can murder its own citizens, and it appears for good reason, as this document basically boils down to “We can do what we want where we want to whomever we want.”
- randomactsofchaos reblogged this from fearandwar
- randomactsofchaos likes this
- fearandwar posted this